There is a sentence people like to repeat when money is tight: if something matters enough, you will find a way to pay for it.
I understand the instinct behind it. Priorities do matter. But sometimes this sentence is complete nonsense.
If rent, food, medicine and debt already consume your income, there is no secret pile of money waiting to be unlocked by wanting something more.
A serious conversation about cryopreservation has to begin there. We should not shame somebody for having no financial margin, especially while claiming that our whole project exists because human lives matter.
We should also not make the opposite mistake.
Low income today does not always mean low income forever. This is obvious for many students, but it can also be true after unemployment, relocation, divorce or the beginning of a career.
The useful question is therefore not, “Can I afford everything right now?” It is, “Which part can I not afford, and is that situation likely to change?”
The same 50 euros does not cost everyone the same
Tomorrow.bio's standard European membership costs 50 euros per month or 500 euros per year. These numbers are public and easy to understand.
The burden is not.
Fifty euros can be one forgettable dinner for one person and the remaining grocery budget for another. Calling it a flat price does not make its effect equal.
This is why we offer means-tested membership from 5 euros per month. The conversation is confidential and the rate is based on what the person can genuinely afford.
Students can receive a 90 percent discount for three years after providing proof of enrolment. The current terms are on our membership page, and anyone who needs the reduced rate can contact sales@tomorrow.bio.
I think this matters for more than the obvious commercial reason.
A membership should not become a test of how much discomfort somebody is willing to tolerate to prove commitment. We want arrangements that survive ordinary life, not heroic payments that collapse three months later.
The lower rate keeps membership accessible during a difficult period. It maintains the relationship, the paperwork and the standby arrangement while a person's financial position develops.
But there is an important limit, and hiding it would help nobody.
The discount solves one bill
Membership and cryopreservation funding are separate.
The reduced rate applies to membership. It does not reduce the current member funding requirement of 200,000 euros for whole-body cryopreservation or 75,000 euros for brain-only cryopreservation.
Those larger amounts cover the procedure and long-term storage. Most members do not hold that money in cash. They arrange a funding method in advance, often life insurance.
This distinction sounds basic. In practice, it changes the entire conversation.
Internal interviews with members showed a recurring pattern. Some people carried the idea for years because “too expensive” existed in their mind as one large, vague obstacle.
Once they separated the monthly membership from the future preservation payment, the problem became specific. Sometimes insurance made it manageable. Sometimes a better income did. Sometimes the remaining barrier was real.
That is useful information in all three cases.
If 50 euros is the only obstacle, the reduced membership may solve it directly. If the insurance premium is the obstacle, reducing membership helps but does not finish the plan.
If health makes insurance unavailable, a discount cannot reverse underwriting. Savings, existing cover, assets or another funding route may still work, but they require a different conversation.
The funding options are not interchangeable, and the right one depends on age, health, country and financial circumstances.
This is why “cryonics is affordable” is too broad. So is “cryonics is only for rich people.” Both slogans delete the person standing in front of us.
Being young helps, but it does not make the plan easy
Students occupy a strange financial position.
They often have very little income now. At the same time, their age and health may make life insurance easier and cheaper to arrange than it will be later.
That can create pressure to act immediately. The argument is mechanical: insurance prices reflect risk, and risk usually rises with age or a serious diagnosis.
Still, a cheap policy that you cannot keep is not a clever financial victory.
Student income can disappear between graduation and the first stable job. A move to another country can change the available products. Rent can rise. Debt can begin to bite.
The three-year student discount is meant to help across that unstable period. It is a bridge, not a promise that every part of the arrangement will feel easy when the discount ends.
Before starting, look at the full monthly amount and the date when each temporary condition changes.
When does the student discount end? When does a term insurance policy expire? What happens if income is interrupted for six months?
These are boring questions. Good. The plan should survive boring questions.
The comparison between term and whole-life insurance explains why a low premium today is not the complete answer.
Starting young can preserve options. It should not come at the cost of rent, necessary healthcare or a basic emergency reserve.
We would rather help somebody build a plan that lasts than collect a few payments from an arrangement they already know they will cancel.
Sometimes waiting is the responsible answer
I do not mean passive waiting.
“I will look again when life is better” can remain true for fifteen years. It sounds like a plan because it points to the future, but nothing in it tells you when to act.
A real delay has a trigger.
It might be graduation, the end of a probation period, repayment of a specific debt or reaching a defined emergency fund. At that point, you look again.
You can also ask for insurance quotes now without buying anything. That tells you whether the imagined cost is close to reality and whether health already affects eligibility.
This matters because waiting is not neutral. Premiums can rise with age, a future diagnosis can narrow the available cover, and the arrangement remains incomplete in the meantime.
The answer is not to sign up at any cost. It is to compare the cost of acting with the cost of waiting, using your real situation rather than a slogan.
One person may discover that a reduced membership and a modest insurance premium fit comfortably. Another may discover that even 5 euros is currently too much.
Neither answer reveals how much that person values life.
Not being able to afford it does not mean you care less
There is a tendency in longevity circles to treat money as evidence of seriousness. People who pay are committed. People who do not must not want it enough.
I dislike this idea.
Our job is to reduce the barriers we can reduce without pretending the physical costs have disappeared. Standby teams, ambulances, equipment, transport, cryoprotective perfusion and long-term storage all require real resources.
Means-tested membership does not make cryopreservation universally affordable. It does make one part fairer, and that is worth doing.
Insurance can make the preservation fee reachable for many people without six-figure savings. It cannot help everyone, especially when health, age or local availability closes that route.
The honest position sits between optimism and salesmanship.
Cryopreservation is not reserved for wealthy people. Many ordinary working people can fund it, particularly when they arrange cover early. The ultra-rich-only stereotype is simply wrong.
It is also not available to every person on every income today.
If you are a student or living on a low income, do not begin by asking whether you can somehow absorb the entire cost.
Separate the bills. Find the exact obstacle. Use the reduced rate if it solves the membership problem, then work through funding without sacrificing the life in front of you.
And if the numbers do not work yet, attach the decision to a real date and come back to it. That is not giving up.
It is taking the problem seriously enough to build something that can survive.
TL;DR: Tomorrow.bio offers means-tested membership from 5 euros per month and a 90 percent student discount for three years. These offers reduce the membership cost, not the separate cryopreservation funding requirement, so the right plan must cover both without displacing essential expenses.
Further reading